The relationship between Gender Inequality and Political and social integration
This study examines the relationship between gender inequality and political and social integration, a critical links exist between economic, social and political variables in the quest to reach out of the reasons behind gender inequality for all citizens. This study suggests that political and social integration may increase the gender inequality positively or negatively. To test the proposed claims we need scientific analysis to produce meaningful results and significance. And here we develop our research question which is: how does political and social integration effects gender inequality?
Quantative data which I use in this paper comes from The Quality of Government (QoG) based on the cross-sectional data. The results covers 194 countries, the conceptualization and operationalization used in study on the impact of gender inequality will be reviewed. And the theoretical framework usually used to study peace operations contributions in quantitative research will also be summarized. Moreover, the main findings using codebook capturing results of dependent and independent variables will be presented, including the results of control variables influences.
2. Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press. Garcia, J. A. (2003). Latino politics in America: Community, culture, and interests.
3. Guthrie, B. J., Young, A. M., Williams, D. R., Boyd, C. J., & Kintner, E. K. (2002). African American girls’ smoking habits and day-to-day experiences with racial discrimination. Nursing Research, 51, 183–190.
4. Haney-Lopez, I. (2000). The social construction of race. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 141–151). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Harris, F. (1994). Something within: Religion as a mobilizer of African American political activism. Journal of Politics, 1, 42–68.
5. Howell, S., & Shryock, A. (2003). Cracking down on diaspora: Arab Detroit and America’s war on terror. Anthropological Quarterly, 76(3), 443–462.
6. Jalalzai, F. (2009). The politics of Muslims in America. Politics and Religion, 2(02), 163–199.Bottom of Form Jamal, A. (2005). The political participation and engagement of Muslim Americans: Mosque involvement and group consciousness. American Politics Research, 33, 521–544.
7. Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clariﬁcation and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16(2), 397–424.
8. Kim, J. (1999). The racial triangulation of Asian Americans. Politics & Society, 27(1), 1–34. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431.
9. Krieger N. (1999). Embodying inequality: A review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. International Journal of Health Services: Planning, Administration, Evaluation, 29(2), 295–352.
10. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littleﬁeld. Gibbons F. X., Gerrard, M., Cleveland, M. J., Wills, T. A., & Brody, G. (2004). Perceived discrimination and substance use in African American parents and their children: A panel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 517–529. Greenwald, G. (2012). NYPD spying program aimed at Muslims. Salon Politics News. Retrieved from http://www.salon. com/2012/02/22/nypd_spying_program_aimed_at_muslims/ Guterbock, T. M., & London, B. (1983). Race, political orientation, and participation: An empirical test of four competing theories. American Sociological Review, 48(4), 439–453.
11. Leary, M. R., Terdal, S. K., Tambor, E. S., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68(3), 518–530.
12. Leonard, K. I. (2003). Muslims in the United States: The state of research. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
13. Maciejewski, P. K., Prigerson, H. G., & Mazure, C. M. (2000). Self-efﬁcacy as a mediator between stressful life events and depressive symptoms. Differences based on history of prior depression. British Journal of Psychiatry: Journal of Mental Science, 176, 373–378. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Marx, G. T. (1967). Protest and prejudice: A study of belief in the black community. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
15. Matthews, D. R., & Prothro, J. (1966). Negroes and the new southern politics. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World. Mays, V. M., Cochran, S. D., & Barnes, N. W. (2007). Race, race-based discrimination, and health outcomes among African Americans. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 201–225.
16. McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. McCluskey, M. R., Deshpande, S., Shah, D. V., & McLeod, D. M. (2004). The efﬁcacy gap and political participation: When political inﬂuence fails to meet expectations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(4), 437–455.
18. McDaniel, E. L. (2008). Politics in the pews: The political mobilization of Black churches. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Michelson, M. R. (2000). Political efﬁcacy and electoral participation of Chicago Latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 81(1), 136–150.
1. Guterbock, T. M., & London, B. (1983). Race, political orientation, and participation: An empirical test of four competing theories. American Sociological Review, 48(4), 439–453.
2. Finch, B. K., Kolody, B., & Vega, W. A. (2000). Perceived discrimination and depression among Mexican-origin adults in California. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(3), 295–313.
3. Dion K. L., & Earn, B. M. (1975). The phenomenology of being a target of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 944–950.
4. Haney-Lopez, I. (2000). The social construction of race. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 141–151). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
5. Campbell, A. L. (2003). Participatory reactions to policy threats: Senior citizens and the defense of Social Security and Medicare. Political Behavior, 25(1), 29–49.
6. Beber, B., Gilligan, M. J., Guardado, J., & Karim, S. (2017). Integration and Gender inequality, Liberia. International Organization, 71(1), 1–30.
7. Beber, B., Gilligan, M. J., Guardado, J., & Karim, S. (2017). Integration and Gender inequality, Liberia. International Organization, 71(1), 1–30.
8. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431.
9. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
AJNU is committed to protecting the privacy of the users of this journal website. The names, personal particulars and e-mail addresses entered in this website will be used only for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available to third parties without the user's permission or due process. Users consent to receive communication from the AJNU for the stated purposes of the journal. Queries with regard to privacy may be directed to firstname.lastname@example.org.