Investigating EFL Teachers’ Strategies to Engage Learners in “Conversation” Classes at University Level
Engagement is broadly defined as learners’ involvement in activities that bring about high-quality learning. Educationally speaking, learners’ engagement outlines the degree of attention, curiosity, interest and passion that learners display as they are learning or being taught. Recently, learners’ engagement has been researched quite intensively as it plays a crucial role in the acquisition of knowledge and duly achievement in the field of teaching/learning foreign languages. The current research attends to English as a foreign language university teachers’ use of a set of strategies/techniques to make learners’ do some actions so as to be prepared for engagement in the ongoing teaching/learning activities and exercises related to their “Conversation” classes. It further aims at identifying the actions done by the teachers of “Conversation” themselves to engage learners. Based on the preceding aims, it is hypothesized that the researched sample of teachers does not require learners to do certain actions as preparation for engagement in the relevant learning activities and do not do what is required from them to engage learners in their classes and duly do not enhance learners’ engagement in the different learning activities To validate the hypotheses, a sample of 12 English as a foreign language university teachers (6 males and 6 females) specialized in linguistics and teaching the subject “Conversation” has been given a 43-item questionnaire, prepared by the researchers and validated through distribution to a panel of juries in the first place and then piloted to a number of English as a foreign language university teachers, to state their responses to a five-point scale that ranges from “always’ to “never”. The results show that the sample of teachers ask learners to do a set of actions as preparation for engagement in the relevant learning activities; they also do what is required from them to engage learners and duly enhance their engagement in the different learning activities.
1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Co.
2. Birolini, A. (2014). Reliability Engineering: Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer.
3. Bomia, L., Beluzo, L., Demeester, D., Elander, K., Johnson, M., and Sheldon, B. (1997). "The impact of teaching strategies on intrinsic motivation." ERIC. Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. p. 294.
4. Chapell, C. and G. Bridley (2002). “Assessment”, in Schmidt, N. (ed.). An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. London: Longman, pp. 268-288.
5. Chapman, E. (2003) "Assessing student engagement rates," ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. ERIC identifier: ED482269.
6. Christenson, S. L., and Anderson, A. R. (2002). Commentary: The centrality of the learning context for learners' academic enabler skills. School Psychology Review, 31(3), pp. 378-393.
7. Connell, J. and Wellborn, J. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar, and L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self process in development: Minnesota Symposium of Child Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 29, pp. 244-254.
8. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. and Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74: pp. 59–109.
9. Hill, P. and Rowe, K. (1996). Multilevel modeling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, pp. 1-34.
10. Krause, K. and Coates, H. (2008). Learners’ engagement in first‐year university. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892, pp.493-505. Retrieved 23/6/2019.
11. Lado, R. (1961). Language Testing: The Construction and Use of Foreign Language tests. London: Longman Group Ltd.
12. Markwell, D. (2007), A large and liberal education': higher education for the 21st century, Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing and Trinity College, University of Melbourne.
13. --------------- (2006). The relationship between teachers’ perceptions of student motivation and engagement and teachers’ enjoyment of and confidence in teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), pp. 73-93.
14. Newmann, F. (1992). Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools. Teachers College Press. pp. 2–3.
15. Teven, J. and McCroskey, J. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, pp. 1-9.
16. Zepke, N. and Leach, L. (2010). Beyond hard outcomes: ‘soft 'outcomes and engagement as student success. Teaching in Higher Education, 15: pp. 661–73.
17. References from the Net
18. Almarado, J. T. (2018). “8 Ways to Increase the Engagement in Your Classroom” in Teaching Methods. Retrieved 19/5/2019.
19. Ferlazzo, L. (2014). The Best Ways to Engage Students in Learning. Student Engagement. From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 5/9/2019.
20. The Glossary of Education Reform for Journalists, Parents, and Community Members. Retrieved 19/5/2019.
21. Young, S. (2015). 14 Activities That Increase Student Engagement During Reading Instruction. Reading Horizons. Retrieved 15/9/2019.
References from the Net
1. http://www.greatschoolspartnership.org.Retrieved 19/5/2019.
2. http://www.ehow.com. Retrieved 26/6/2019
3. http://www.scientificlanguage.com/esp/classroom-management.pdf. Retrieved 15/8/2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
AJNU is committed to protecting the privacy of the users of this journal website. The names, personal particulars and e-mail addresses entered in this website will be used only for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available to third parties without the user's permission or due process. Users consent to receive communication from the AJNU for the stated purposes of the journal. Queries with regard to privacy may be directed to email@example.com.