Evaluating the Teaching of Academic Debate and Critical Thinking Course at Iraqi Kurdistan Universities

  • Fatimah R. Hasan Al Bajalani Department of English, College of Languages, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Barham S. Abdulrahman Department of English, College of Basic Education, University of Sulaimani, and (Department of English Language, University College of Goizha), Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Abstract

The study is based on the assumption that the current curricula in the Iraqi Kurdistan Universities (henceforth IKU) were not satisfactorily compatible with the scientific, technological and industrial needs of the Region’s markets. These curricula neither help students to develop their skills nor assist them in thinking creatively. Therefore, the new curricula are supposed to educate undergraduates to increase their capabilities in research, information dissemination and learning a second/foreign language. The Academic Debate and Critical Thinking (ADCT) course was added to all freshmen programs in order to prepare them for university life and make them proficient cadre for their future occupation. This course helps students to be critical thinkers and effective communicators. Since the new version of this course has been implemented for four years, this study attempts to evaluate the course and find out how it is taught, how effective it is, what topics are studied, what activities are used, what types of assessment are employed and what are the main challenges that teachers and students face in dealing with this course. The sample of the study are the teachers of ADCT and the first year students in the English departments in both Colleges of Basic Education at Salahaddin University-Erbil and the University of Sulaimani in the academic year 2017-2018. Two questionnaires were prepared using Google Form. The students’ responses revealed that debating is focused on, general social problems are debated, academic posters are used more, and group work is dominating class activities. As for teachers’ responses, they think that the objectives of the course are clear and achievable, discussion and debating are mostly used, and the assessment system suggested by the textbook is used accurately except for poster design which some teachers do not teach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bellon, J. (2000). A research based justification for debate across the curriculum. Argumentation and Advocacy, 36, 161-175.
2. Brookfield, S. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking. USA: Jossy-Bass.
3. Butterworth, J. and Thwaites, G. (2013). Thinking skills: Critical thinking and problem solving. (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Eggen, P. and Kauchak, D. (2006). Strategies and models for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills. (5th Edition). Boston: Pearson.
5. Ericson, J.; Murphy, J. and Zeuschner, R. (2003). The debater’s guide. (3rd Edition.). USA: Southern Illinois University Press.
6. Fedrizzi, M. and Ellis, R. (2011). Debate. USA: South-Western, Cengage learning.
7. Freeley, A. and Steinberg, D. (2009). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. (12th Edition). USA: Wordsworth Cengage Learning.
8. Halpern, D. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. (5th Edition). New York: Psychology Press.
9. Henson, K. (2015). Curriculum planning: Integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, and education reform. (5th Edition). US: Waveland Press, Inc.
10. Krieger, Daniel. (2005). Teaching debate to ESL students: A six-class unit. The Internet TESL Journal, 11. Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Krieger-Debate.html
11. McKeachie, W. J. (1999). Teaching tips. (10th Edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin company.
12. Mihimdi, E. (2010). The relationship between EFL college students’ critical thinking and their performance in essay writing. Unpublished MA Thesis, Baghdad University.
13. Moore, B. and Parker, R. (2003). Critical thinking. (7th Edition). Boston: McGraw Hill.
14. Nisbett, R. (2003). The geography of thought. New York: The Free Press.
15. Omelicheva, M. (2007). Resolved: Academic debate should be a part of political science curricula, Journal of Political Science Education 3,161-177.
16. Rybold, G. (2006). Speaking, listening and understanding: debate for non-native English speakers. New York: International Debate Education Association.
17. Snider, A. and Schnurer, M. (2006). Many sides: Debate across the curriculum. New York: International Debate Education Association.
18. Vo, H. X., & Morris, R. L. (2006). Debate as a tool in teaching economics: Rationale, technique and some evidence. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 315–320. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.81.6.315-320
Published
2020-07-17
How to Cite
HASAN AL BAJALANI, Fatimah R.; ABDULRAHMAN, Barham S.. Evaluating the Teaching of Academic Debate and Critical Thinking Course at Iraqi Kurdistan Universities. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 3, p. 178-195, july 2020. ISSN 2520-789X. Available at: <http://journals.nawroz.edu.krd/index.php/ajnu/article/view/774>. Date accessed: 08 aug. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v9n3a774.
Section
Articles