Evaluating the Teaching of Academic Debate and Critical Thinking Course at Iraqi Kurdistan Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v9n3a774Abstract
The study is based on the assumption that the current curricula in the Iraqi Kurdistan Universities (henceforth IKU) were not satisfactorily compatible with the scientific, technological and industrial needs of the Region’s markets. These curricula neither help students to develop their skills nor assist them in thinking creatively. Therefore, the new curricula are supposed to educate undergraduates to increase their capabilities in research, information dissemination and learning a second/foreign language. The Academic Debate and Critical Thinking (ADCT) course was added to all freshmen programs in order to prepare them for university life and make them proficient cadre for their future occupation. This course helps students to be critical thinkers and effective communicators. Since the new version of this course has been implemented for four years, this study attempts to evaluate the course and find out how it is taught, how effective it is, what topics are studied, what activities are used, what types of assessment are employed and what are the main challenges that teachers and students face in dealing with this course. The sample of the study are the teachers of ADCT and the first year students in the English departments in both Colleges of Basic Education at Salahaddin University-Erbil and the University of Sulaimani in the academic year 2017-2018. Two questionnaires were prepared using Google Form. The students’ responses revealed that debating is focused on, general social problems are debated, academic posters are used more, and group work is dominating class activities. As for teachers’ responses, they think that the objectives of the course are clear and achievable, discussion and debating are mostly used, and the assessment system suggested by the textbook is used accurately except for poster design which some teachers do not teach.
Downloads
References
2. Brookfield, S. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking. USA: Jossy-Bass.
3. Butterworth, J. and Thwaites, G. (2013). Thinking skills: Critical thinking and problem solving. (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Eggen, P. and Kauchak, D. (2006). Strategies and models for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills. (5th Edition). Boston: Pearson.
5. Ericson, J.; Murphy, J. and Zeuschner, R. (2003). The debater’s guide. (3rd Edition.). USA: Southern Illinois University Press.
6. Fedrizzi, M. and Ellis, R. (2011). Debate. USA: South-Western, Cengage learning.
7. Freeley, A. and Steinberg, D. (2009). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. (12th Edition). USA: Wordsworth Cengage Learning.
8. Halpern, D. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. (5th Edition). New York: Psychology Press.
9. Henson, K. (2015). Curriculum planning: Integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, and education reform. (5th Edition). US: Waveland Press, Inc.
10. Krieger, Daniel. (2005). Teaching debate to ESL students: A six-class unit. The Internet TESL Journal, 11. Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Krieger-Debate.html
11. McKeachie, W. J. (1999). Teaching tips. (10th Edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin company.
12. Mihimdi, E. (2010). The relationship between EFL college students’ critical thinking and their performance in essay writing. Unpublished MA Thesis, Baghdad University.
13. Moore, B. and Parker, R. (2003). Critical thinking. (7th Edition). Boston: McGraw Hill.
14. Nisbett, R. (2003). The geography of thought. New York: The Free Press.
15. Omelicheva, M. (2007). Resolved: Academic debate should be a part of political science curricula, Journal of Political Science Education 3,161-177.
16. Rybold, G. (2006). Speaking, listening and understanding: debate for non-native English speakers. New York: International Debate Education Association.
17. Snider, A. and Schnurer, M. (2006). Many sides: Debate across the curriculum. New York: International Debate Education Association.
18. Vo, H. X., & Morris, R. L. (2006). Debate as a tool in teaching economics: Rationale, technique and some evidence. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 315–320. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.81.6.315-320
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright
The use of a Creative Commons License enables authors/editors to retain copyright to their work. Publications can be reused and redistributed as long as the original author is correctly attributed.
- Copyright
- The researcher(s), whether a single or joint research paper, must sell and transfer to the publisher (the Academic Journal of Nawroz University) through all the duration of the publication which starts from the date of entering this Agreement into force, the exclusive rights of the research paper/article. These rights include the translation, reuse of papers/articles, transmit or distribute, or use the material or parts(s) contained therein to be published in scientific, academic, technical, professional journals or any other periodicals including any other works derived from them, all over the world, in English and Arabic, whether in print or in electronic edition of such journals and periodicals in all types of media or formats now or that may exist in the future. Rights also include giving license (or granting permission) to a third party to use the materials and any other works derived from them and publish them in such journals and periodicals all over the world. Transfer right under this Agreement includes the right to modify such materials to be used with computer systems and software, or to reproduce or publish it in e-formats and also to incorporate them into retrieval systems.
- Reproduction, reference, transmission, distribution or any other use of the content, or any parts of the subjects included in that content in any manner permitted by this Agreement, must be accompanied by mentioning the source which is (the Academic Journal of Nawroz University) and the publisher in addition to the title of the article, the name of the author (or co-authors), journal’s name, volume or issue, publisher's copyright, and publication year.
- The Academic Journal of Nawroz University reserves all rights to publish research papers/articles issued under a “Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of the paper/article by any means, provided that the original work is correctly cited.
- Reservation of Rights
The researcher(s) preserves all intellectual property rights (except for the one transferred to the publisher under this Agreement).
- Researcher’s guarantee
The researcher(s) hereby guarantees that the content of the paper/article is original. It has been submitted only to the Academic Journal of Nawroz University and has not been previously published by any other party.
In the event that the paper/article is written jointly with other researchers, the researcher guarantees that he/she has informed the other co-authors about the terms of this agreement, as well as obtaining their signature or written permission to sign on their behalf.
The author further guarantees:
- The research paper/article does not contain any defamatory statements or illegal comments.
- The research paper/article does not violate other's rights (including but not limited to copyright, patent, and trademark rights).
This research paper/article does not contain any facts or instructions that could cause damages or harm to others, and publishing it does not lead to disclosure of any confidential information.
