• Ziyad R. Kasim Department of English, College of Education for Humanities, University of Mosul, Iraq



Arabic, stops, vot, vowel duration


Vowel durations have been reported in many languages to vary before syllable final stops; these durations are shorter before voiceless stops and longer before voiced ones. One type of explanations to this phenomenon suggests prevocalic effect influencing vowel duration variation. The present study attempts at a preliminary investigation to find out whether the voice onset time (VOT) of a syllable initial stop can be correlated with this vowel duration variation in a CVC context in Arabic. Measurements of the VOT of the Arabic voiceless uvular stop /q/ are made where /q/ is the first C, V is one of /a:/, /u:/ and /i:/ and the final C is either /t/ or /d/. A Paired-Samples T-Test is used to compare between the VOT measurements of /q/ of the words containing /t/ and those containing /d/. The result of the comparison did not show any significant difference; no relationship could be found between the VOT of the initial stop and vowel duration variation.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Allen, J. S., & Miller, J. L. (1999). Effects of syllable-initial voicing and speaking rate on the temporal characteristics of monosyllabic words. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106, 2031-9.
2. Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 207-227.
3. Kasim, Ziyad R. (2014a). The effect of voiceless-voiced consonants on vowel duration in Arabic. Manuscript submitted for publication, Journal of Education and Science.
4. Kasim, Ziyad R. (2014b). Aspiration in Arabic: a spectrographic study. Manuscript submitted for publication, Journal of Education and Science.
5. Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Lucy, P. A., & Charles-Lucy, J. (1985). Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 76, 1949-1957.
7. Maddieson, I. (1997). Phonetic universals. In: W. J. Hardcastle, & J. Laver (Eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 619-639). Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Metz, D. E., Allen, K., Kling, T., Maisonet, S., McCullough, R., Schiavetti, N., & Whitehead, R. L. (2006). Effect of syllable-initial voicing on vowel duration during simultaneous communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 192-199.
9. Naeser, M. A. (1970). Influence of initial and final consonants on vowel duration in CVC syllables. Technical Report NO. 130. Wisconsin Research and Development, Center for Cognitive Learning, The University of Wisconsinc/Madison, Wisconsin.
10. Peterson, G. E., & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 62, 693-703.
11. Port, R. F., & Dalby, J. (1982). Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 141-152.
12. Reetz, H., & Jongman, A. (2009). Phonetics: transcription, production, acoustics and perception. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
13. Tauberer, J., & Evanini, K. (2009). Intrinsic vowel duration and the post-vocalic voicing effect: Some evidence from dialects of North American English. Proceeding of Interspeech 2009. Brighton, UK. International Speech Communication Association, 2211-2214. Retrieved December 19th, 2017 from Iraq Virtual Science Library (IVSL).
14. Van Santen, J. P. H. (1992). Contextual effects on vowel duration. Speech Communication, 11, 513-546.



How to Cite

Kasim, Z. R. (2019). CAN VOICE ONSET TIME EXPLAIN VOWEL DURATION VARIATION?. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 8(4), 311–315.