Examining Dentistry College Students' Recognition of the Semantic/Pragmatic Function of Hedges in English Scientific Writing


  • Hivee khaled Jamel Department of English, Duhok University, Kurdistan Region, IRAQ




hedging, hedging devices, semantic, pragmatic function of hedges


One of the most importantcharacteristics of English scientific writing is the use of cautious language, known as “hedging”. A proper awareness of their use and function is crucial to scientific precision, scientific integrity, and author-reader relationship. However, EFL college students face difficulties in recognizing hedging devices in academic writing. The present study aimed at examining the recognition of a scientific college final year students of the semantic/ pragmatic function of hedges in scientific English writing to answer the research question of whether they are able to perform satisfactorily in such a sensitive area as that of science, bearing in mind that they are supposed to be advanced students who have been instructed in scientific English for five years.For that purpose, final year students of the academic year 2020-2021, from the College of Dentistry were chosen. The total number of participants was 71 students. The study followed the quantitative method for its design, used as its instrument a close-ended questionnaire, and employed the SPSS for data analysis.The study showed that the students did not perform satisfactorily; a finding which calls for concern and implies that an explicit instruction in English scientific writing is needed. The study concluded that more attention should be directed towards teaching this aspect in scientific English in order to prepare the students to better deal with the requirements of academic/ scientific writing.


Download data is not yet available.


Adamczyk, M. (2015). Do hedges always hedge? On non-canonical multifunctionality of jakby in Polish. Pragmatics, 25(3), 321-344.

Banks, D. (1998). Vague quantification in the scientific journal article. ASP. La Revue du Geras, (19-22), 17-27.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Some universals in language usage politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cabanes, P. P. (2007). A contrastive analysis of hedging in English and Spanish architecture project descriptions. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, (20), 139-158.

Caffi, C. (2007). Mitigation Amsterdam (ua).

Clemen, G. (1997). The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. Research in text theory, 235-248.

Fraser, B. (1975). Hedged performatives. In Speech acts (pp. 187-210). Brill.

Fraser, B. (2010). Hedging in political discourse. OKULSKA, U., CAP., Perspectives in Political Discourse, capitolo, 8.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Maryland: University Park Press. http://library.lol/main/C67598B8BE85FF6DE503246E07C7E74E

Hinkel, E. (2005). Hedging, inflating, and persuading in L2 academic writing. Applied Language Learning, 15(1/2), 29.

Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes-Elmsford and Oxford, 13, 239-239.

Hyland, K. (1995). The author in the text: Hedging scientific writing. Hong Kong papers in linguistics and language teaching, 18, 33-42.

Hyland, K. (1996a). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written communication, 13(2), 251-281.

Hyland, K. (1996b). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied linguistics, 17(4), 433-454.

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles (Vol. 54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic text. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179-197.

Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1-23.

Lakoff, G. (1975). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Contemporary research in philosophical logic and linguistic semantics (pp. 221-271). Springer, Dordrecht.

Lee, M. (2020). Hedges and boosters: L1 and L2speakers’ comprehension and production(Doctoral dissertation, San Francisco State University).

Mahmood, M. (2018). Semantic and Syntactic Realizations of Hedging in Introductions of Written Academic Discourse. University-Erbil Scientific Journal, (1), 23-36.https://cuesj.cihanuniversity.edu.iq/2018/08/22/semantic-and-syntactic-realizations-of-hedging-in-introductions-of-written-academic-discourse/

Martín, P. M. (2008). The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 133-152.

Mukheef, R. N. (2012). Investigating knowledge and use of Iraqi EFL university learners of hedging devices. Journal of University of Babylon, 20(3), 745-779.

Prince, E. F., Frader, J. R., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. En J. di Prieto (ed.), Linguistics and the Professions, 83-97.

Rabab'ah, G. (2013). Hedging in nursing and education academic articles. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 6,195-215.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149-170.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications, 105-118.https://www.tesol-france.org/uploaded_files/files/TESOL%20V2N2%20C8%20I%20think%20that%20Perhaps.pdf

Skelton, J. (1988). The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT journal, 42(1), 37-43.

Varttala, T. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse. Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Tampere University Press.

Data for the Questionnaire

Bongelli, R., Riccioni, I., Burro, R., & Zuczkowski, A. (2019). Writers’ uncertainty in scientific and popular biomedical articles. A comparative analysis of the British Medical Journal and Discover Magazine. PloS one, 14(9), e0221933.

Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2008). If-conditionals in medical discourse: From theory to disciplinary practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(3), 191-205.

Chavez, T. D. F. (2004). The Language of Uncertainty in a New Illness: Hedging and Modality in the Biomedical Discourse of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Mahidol University.

Csongor, A. (2013). Rhetorical Moves and Hedging in Medical Research Articles and their Online Popularizations (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pécs, Faculty of Health Sciences Doctoral School of Health Sciences. 2013. Available from: http://ltsp. etk. pte. hu/portal/wp/File/Doktoriiskola/Tezisfuzetek/CsongorA_dissz. pdf).

Greig, S. L., & Deeks, E. D. (2015). Abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine single-tablet regimen: a review of its use in HIV-1 infection. Drugs, 75(5), 503-514.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40265-015-0361-6

Hanauer, D. A., Liu, Y., Mei, Q., Manion, F. J., Balis, U. J., & Zheng, K. (2012). Hedging their mets: the use of uncertainty terms in clinical documents and its potential implications whensharing the documents with patients. In AMIA Annual SymposiumProceedings (Vol. 2012, p. 321). American Medical Informatics Association.

Hykes, J. M. (2000). A comparison of the use of modal verbs in research articles by professionals and non-native speaking graduate students, 52. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8928&context=rtd



How to Cite

Jamel, H. khaled. (2021). Examining Dentistry College Students’ Recognition of the Semantic/Pragmatic Function of Hedges in English Scientific Writing. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 10(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v10n2a1042