Examining Dentistry College Students' Recognition of the Semantic/Pragmatic Function of Hedges in English Scientific Writing

Authors

  • Hivee khaled Jamel Department of English, Duhok University, Kurdistan Region, IRAQ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v10n2a1042

Keywords:

hedging, hedging devices, semantic, pragmatic function of hedges

Abstract

One of the most importantcharacteristics of English scientific writing is the use of cautious language, known as “hedging”. A proper awareness of their use and function is crucial to scientific precision, scientific integrity, and author-reader relationship. However, EFL college students face difficulties in recognizing hedging devices in academic writing. The present study aimed at examining the recognition of a scientific college final year students of the semantic/ pragmatic function of hedges in scientific English writing to answer the research question of whether they are able to perform satisfactorily in such a sensitive area as that of science, bearing in mind that they are supposed to be advanced students who have been instructed in scientific English for five years.For that purpose, final year students of the academic year 2020-2021, from the College of Dentistry were chosen. The total number of participants was 71 students. The study followed the quantitative method for its design, used as its instrument a close-ended questionnaire, and employed the SPSS for data analysis.The study showed that the students did not perform satisfactorily; a finding which calls for concern and implies that an explicit instruction in English scientific writing is needed. The study concluded that more attention should be directed towards teaching this aspect in scientific English in order to prepare the students to better deal with the requirements of academic/ scientific writing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamczyk, M. (2015). Do hedges always hedge? On non-canonical multifunctionality of jakby in Polish. Pragmatics, 25(3), 321-344.

Banks, D. (1998). Vague quantification in the scientific journal article. ASP. La Revue du Geras, (19-22), 17-27.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Some universals in language usage politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cabanes, P. P. (2007). A contrastive analysis of hedging in English and Spanish architecture project descriptions. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, (20), 139-158.

Caffi, C. (2007). Mitigation Amsterdam (ua).

Clemen, G. (1997). The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. Research in text theory, 235-248.

Fraser, B. (1975). Hedged performatives. In Speech acts (pp. 187-210). Brill.

Fraser, B. (2010). Hedging in political discourse. OKULSKA, U., CAP., Perspectives in Political Discourse, capitolo, 8.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Maryland: University Park Press. http://library.lol/main/C67598B8BE85FF6DE503246E07C7E74E

Hinkel, E. (2005). Hedging, inflating, and persuading in L2 academic writing. Applied Language Learning, 15(1/2), 29.

Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes-Elmsford and Oxford, 13, 239-239.

Hyland, K. (1995). The author in the text: Hedging scientific writing. Hong Kong papers in linguistics and language teaching, 18, 33-42.

Hyland, K. (1996a). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written communication, 13(2), 251-281.

Hyland, K. (1996b). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied linguistics, 17(4), 433-454.

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles (Vol. 54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic text. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179-197.

Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1-23.

Lakoff, G. (1975). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Contemporary research in philosophical logic and linguistic semantics (pp. 221-271). Springer, Dordrecht.

Lee, M. (2020). Hedges and boosters: L1 and L2speakers’ comprehension and production(Doctoral dissertation, San Francisco State University).

Mahmood, M. (2018). Semantic and Syntactic Realizations of Hedging in Introductions of Written Academic Discourse. University-Erbil Scientific Journal, (1), 23-36.https://cuesj.cihanuniversity.edu.iq/2018/08/22/semantic-and-syntactic-realizations-of-hedging-in-introductions-of-written-academic-discourse/

Martín, P. M. (2008). The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 133-152.

Mukheef, R. N. (2012). Investigating knowledge and use of Iraqi EFL university learners of hedging devices. Journal of University of Babylon, 20(3), 745-779.

Prince, E. F., Frader, J. R., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. En J. di Prieto (ed.), Linguistics and the Professions, 83-97.

Rabab'ah, G. (2013). Hedging in nursing and education academic articles. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 6,195-215.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149-170.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications, 105-118.https://www.tesol-france.org/uploaded_files/files/TESOL%20V2N2%20C8%20I%20think%20that%20Perhaps.pdf

Skelton, J. (1988). The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT journal, 42(1), 37-43.

Varttala, T. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse. Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Tampere University Press.

Data for the Questionnaire

Bongelli, R., Riccioni, I., Burro, R., & Zuczkowski, A. (2019). Writers’ uncertainty in scientific and popular biomedical articles. A comparative analysis of the British Medical Journal and Discover Magazine. PloS one, 14(9), e0221933.

Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2008). If-conditionals in medical discourse: From theory to disciplinary practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(3), 191-205.

Chavez, T. D. F. (2004). The Language of Uncertainty in a New Illness: Hedging and Modality in the Biomedical Discourse of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Mahidol University.

Csongor, A. (2013). Rhetorical Moves and Hedging in Medical Research Articles and their Online Popularizations (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pécs, Faculty of Health Sciences Doctoral School of Health Sciences. 2013. Available from: http://ltsp. etk. pte. hu/portal/wp/File/Doktoriiskola/Tezisfuzetek/CsongorA_dissz. pdf).

Greig, S. L., & Deeks, E. D. (2015). Abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine single-tablet regimen: a review of its use in HIV-1 infection. Drugs, 75(5), 503-514.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40265-015-0361-6

Hanauer, D. A., Liu, Y., Mei, Q., Manion, F. J., Balis, U. J., & Zheng, K. (2012). Hedging their mets: the use of uncertainty terms in clinical documents and its potential implications whensharing the documents with patients. In AMIA Annual SymposiumProceedings (Vol. 2012, p. 321). American Medical Informatics Association.

Hykes, J. M. (2000). A comparison of the use of modal verbs in research articles by professionals and non-native speaking graduate students, 52. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8928&context=rtd

Downloads

Published

2021-06-24

How to Cite

Jamel, H. khaled. (2021). Examining Dentistry College Students’ Recognition of the Semantic/Pragmatic Function of Hedges in English Scientific Writing. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 10(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v10n2a1042

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Hivee khaled Jamel

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright

The use of a Creative Commons License enables authors/editors to retain copyright to their work. Publications can be reused and redistributed as long as the original author is correctly attributed.

 

  1. Copyright

 

  1. The researcher(s), whether a single or joint research paper, must sell and transfer to the publisher (the Academic Journal of Nawroz University) through all the duration of the publication which starts from the date of entering this Agreement into force, the exclusive rights of the research paper/article. These rights include the translation, reuse of papers/articles, transmit or distribute, or use the material or parts(s) contained therein to be published in scientific, academic, technical, professional journals or any other periodicals including any other works derived from them, all over the world, in English and Arabic, whether in print or in electronic edition of such journals and periodicals in all types of media or formats now or that may exist in the future. Rights also include giving license (or granting permission) to a third party to use the materials and any other works derived from them and publish them in such journals and periodicals all over the world. Transfer right under this Agreement includes the right to modify such materials to be used with computer systems and software, or to reproduce or publish it in e-formats and also to incorporate them into retrieval systems.

 

  1. Reproduction, reference, transmission, distribution or any other use of the content, or any parts of the subjects included in that content in any manner permitted by this Agreement, must be accompanied by mentioning the source which is (the Academic Journal of Nawroz University) and the publisher in addition to the title of the article, the name of the author (or co-authors), journal’s name, volume or issue, publisher's copyright, and publication year.

 

  1. The Academic Journal of Nawroz University reserves all rights to publish research papers/articles issued under a “Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of the paper/article by any means, provided that the original work is correctly cited.

 

  1. Reservation of Rights

The researcher(s) preserves all intellectual property rights (except for the one transferred to the publisher under this Agreement).

  1. Researcher’s guarantee

The researcher(s) hereby guarantees that the content of the paper/article is original. It has been submitted only to the Academic Journal of Nawroz University and has not been previously published by any other party.

In the event that the paper/article is written jointly with other researchers, the researcher guarantees that he/she has informed the other co-authors about the terms of this agreement, as well as obtaining their signature or written permission to sign on their behalf.

The author further guarantees:

  • The research paper/article does not contain any defamatory statements or illegal comments.
  • The research paper/article does not violate other's rights (including but not limited to copyright, patent, and trademark rights).

This research paper/article does not contain any facts or instructions that could cause damages or harm to others, and publishing it does not lead to disclosure of any confidential information.