Spoken Grammar: Meaning, Principles and Characteristics
Keywords:Spoken Grammar, Written Grammar, Conversational spoken English, Grammatical rules
The terms Spoken Grammar was coined by the two corpus grammarians, Ronald Carter and Mike McCarthy. In the 19th century, it came under the impact of a number of local dialects represented by the cockney dialect in London, and the Lothian dialect in Edinburgh. The discussions, debates and studies on Spoken grammar have led to the specification of three main viewpoints concerning the existence of this types of grammar. The viewpoints entail that (1) grammatical rules do not govern spoken language, which is disorderly and disordered; (2) Speaking English lacks a distinct grammar. It has the same syntax as written English grammar; and (3) spoken language is regulated by a separate grammar with its own set of rules and conventions; i.e. it has its own grammar represented by its own set of rules, regulations, and classifications compared to those of the written language. T validate or refute the implications of the preceding viewpoints, relevant literature concludes that spoken grammar is quite prevalent in everyday conversational spoken English. It is characterized by being more flexible and less strict compared to written grammar. This is so because the informal context of using spoken grammar makes it have a syntax that varies from the traditional written grammar in a number of aspects. This purely theoretical research aims at shedding light on the definition, meaning, principles and the main characteristics of spoken grammar. The emphasis on the distinctive features of spoken grammar has triggered the researchers to focus on a further point of discussion, namely the differences between spoken and written grammar. To substantiate such differences, examples from closely relevant grammatical literature have also been provided. The research ends with some concluding points drawn upon from the preceding discussed and presented points.
Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where It's Heading. New York: Routledge.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (1995). Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16, 141-158.
Carter, R. and Mcarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide. (1st ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
Cheshire, J. (1999). "Spoken Standard English", Standard English: The Widening Debate, ed. by Tony Bex and Richard J. Watts. New York: Routledge,
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emerson, O. F. (1896). The Teaching of English Grammar.
Goh, C. (2009). “Perspectives on spoken grammar”. ELT Journal 63 (4): 303–312.
Hird, J. ( 2016). It’s different, spoken grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press ELT
Paterson, K. (2019). “9 thoughts on “It’s different, spoken grammar”, Grammar Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning, 50 (4): 675–724.
Mumford, S. (2009). An analysis of spoken grammar: The case for production. ELT Journal 63 (2): 137–144.
TESOL (2003). Designing Natural Spoken English Courses. Spain: Valencia..
The Cambridge International Corpus (CIC)*).
Timmis, I. (2005). Towards a framework for teaching spoken grammar. ELT Journal 59 (2): 117–125.
Usó-Juan, E. and Martínez-Flor, A. (2008). Teaching learners to appropriately mitigate requests. ELT Journal, 62(4), 349-357.
Zhou, Q. (2006). Application of a discourse approach to speaking in teaching of conversation. US-China Education Review, 3(3), 57-63.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Ru’a Salim Mahmood, Hussein Ali Ahmed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
AJNU is committed to protecting the privacy of the users of this journal website. The names, personal particulars and e-mail addresses entered in this website will be used only for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available to third parties without the user's permission or due process. Users consent to receive communication from the AJNU for the stated purposes of the journal. Queries with regard to privacy may be directed to [email protected]