Determinants of Audit Fees : Evidence from UK Alternative Investment Market
Keywords:Audit fees, Auditee size, Auditee complexity, Non-audit fees
The main purpose of this study is to examine the determinants of audit fees in the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) using a sample of 23 machinery equipment companies covering the period from 2007 to 2011. The factors that have been hypothesised to be having a significant correlation with audit fees are auditee size, auditee complexity, audit risk, and auditor size. The results show that auditee size and auditee complexity are the main significant determinants of audit fees in the AIM. The findings also indicated a positive relationship between audit timing and audit fees. However, there was not significant evidence of a positive correlation between auditee risk and audit fees, which demonstrated that risk perceived by the auditor does not affect the value of fees. The results also indicated that there is no difference in the fees value between large or small clients. Moreover, the study demonstrated that there is no correlation between providing non-audit service and audit fees. Therefore, it is believed that the differences of these results with other studies in this field are due to the differences in the regulatory framework of the market selected as a sample for this study.
2. Abidin, S., Beattie, V., & Goodacre, A. (2010). Audit market structure, fees and choice in a period of structural change : Evidence from the UK–1998–2003. The British Accounting Review, 42(3), 187–206.
3. Ahmed, K., & Goyal, M. K. (2005). A comparative study of pricing of audit services in emerging economies. International Journal of Auditing, 9(2), 103–116.
4. Al-Harshani, M. O. (2008). The pricing of audit services : evidence from Kuwait. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(7), 685–696.
5. Al-Matarneh, G. F. (2012). The pricing of audit services : Evidence from Jordan. International Business Research, 5(3), 114.
6. Alexeyeva, I. (2012). Effect of different economic conditions on audit and non-audit fees : Evidence from Sweden.
7. Barefield, R. M., Gaver, J. J., & Keefe, T. B. O. (1993). Additional evidence on the economics of attest : Extending results from the audit market to the market for compilations and reviews. Auditing, 12(1), 76.
8. Barkess, L., & Simnett, R. (1994). The provision of other services by auditors : Independence and pricing issues. Accounting and Business Research, 24(94), 99–108.
9. Beattie, V., & Fearnley, S. (2002). Auditor independence and non-audit services : A literature review. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, London.
10. Behn, B. K., Choi, J.-H., & Kang, T. (2008). Audit quality and properties of analyst earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 327–349.
11. Berenson, M., Levine, D., Szabat, K. A., & Krehbiel, T. C. (2012). Basic business statistics : Concepts and applications. Pearson higher education AU.
12. Boo, E., & Sharma, D. (2008). Effect of regulatory oversight on the association between internal governance characteristics and audit fees. Accounting & Finance, 48(1), 51–71.
13. Brinn, T., Peel, M. J., & Roberts, R. (1992). Determinants of the External Audit Fee of UK Unquoted Companies—Some New Evidence. Management Research News, 15(8), 14–17.
14. Carson, E., & Fargher, N. (2007). Note on audit fee premiums to client size and industry specialization. Accounting & Finance, 47(3), 423–446.
15. Chan, K. H., Lin, K. Z., & Zhang, F. (2007). On the association between changes in corporate ownership and changes in auditor quality in a transitional economy. Journal of International Accounting Research, 6(1), 19–36.
16. Chan, P., Ezzamel, M., & Gwilliam, D. (1993). Determinants of audit fees for quoted UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 20(6), 765–786.
17. Che-Ahmad, A., & Houghton, K. A. (1996). Audit fee premiums of big eight firms : Evidence from the market for medium-size UK auditees. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 5(1), 53–72.
18. Choi, J.-H., Kim, J.-B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality? Auditing : A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 115–140.
19. Clatworthy, M. A., Mellett, H. J., & Peel, M. J. (2002). The market for external audit services in the public sector : An empirical analysis of NHS trusts. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(9‐10), 1399–1439.
20. Clatworthy, M. A., & Peel, M. J. (2007). The effect of corporate status on external audit fees : Evidence from the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(1‐2), 169–201.
21. Clatworthy, M., Mellett, H., & Peel, M. (2000). Developments : External Audit Fee Levels in NHS Trusts. Public Money and Management, 20(1), 63–68.
22. Cohen, J., Gaynor, L. M., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2007). Auditor communications with the audit committee and the board of directors : Policy recommendations and opportunities for future research. Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 165–187.
23. Colombelli, A. (2010). Alternative investment market : a way to promote entrepreneurship. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 10(3–4), 253–274.
24. Davis, L. R., Ricchiute, D. N., & Trompeter, G. (1993). Audit effort, audit fees, and the provision of nonaudit services to audit clients. Accounting Review, 135–150.
25. Davison, A. G., Stening, B. W., & Wai, W. T. (1984). Auditor concentration and the impact of interlocking directorates. Journal of Accounting Research, 313–317.
26. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor independence, “low balling”, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113–127. http : //doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90009-4
27. Dopuch, N., & Simunic, D. (1980). The nature of competition in the auditing profession : a descriptive and normative view. Regulation and the Accounting Profession, 34(2), 283–289.
28. Firth, M. (2002). Auditor–provided consultancy services and their associations with audit fees and audit opinions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(5‐6), 661–693.
29. Francis, J. R. (1984). The effect of audit firm size on audit prices : A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(2), 133–151.
30. Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345–368.
31. Gist, W. E. (1992). Explaining variability in external audit fees. Accounting and Business Research, 23(89), 79–84.
32. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2003). Basic Econometrics. 4th. New York : McGraw-Hill.
33. Che Ahmad, A., Haniffa, R., Houghton, K. A., & Zalina Mohamad Yusof, N. (2006). The Malaysian market for audit services : ethnicity, multinational companies and auditor choice. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 702–723.
34. Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees : A Meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–191.
35. Hogan, C. E., & Jeter, D. C. (1999). Industry specialization by auditors. Auditing : A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(1), 1–17.
36. ICAEW. (2012). ICAEW helps companies meet new auditor remuneration reporting requirements. http : //doi.org/http : //www.icaew.com/en/about-icaew/newsroom/press-releases/2012-press-releases/ ica ew -helps-companies-meet-new-auditor-remuneration-reporting-requirements
37. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
38. Joshi, P. L., & Al‐Bastaki, H. (2000). Determinants of audit fees : evidence from the companies listed in Bahrain. International Journal of Auditing, 4(2), 129–138.
39. Kasim, M. N. (2005). THE DETERMINANTS OF AUDIT FEES FOR SMEs IN MALAYSIA AND IMPLICATIONS OF MIA GUIDLINES. Universiti Sains Malaysia.
40. Langendijk, H. (1997). The market for audit services in the Netherlands. European Accounting Review, 6(2), 253–264.
41. López, D. M., & Peters, G. F. (2011). Auditor workload compression and busy season auditor switching. Accounting Horizons, 25(2), 357–380.
42. Mallin, C., & Ow-Yong, K. (2012). The UK alternative investment market–ethical dimensions. In Entrepreneurship, Governance and Ethics (pp. 223–239). Springer.
43. Mellett, H., Peel, M. J., & Karbhari, Y. (2007). Audit fee determinants in the UK university sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(2), 155–188.
44. Millichamp, A. H., & Taylor, M. (2008). Auditing and Investigation. Ceteris Publishers, Enugu.
45. Naser, K., & Nuseibeh, R. (2008). Determinants of audit fees : empirical evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 17(3), 239–254.
46. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Whitmore, G. A. (1993). Applied Statistics. 4th Edt. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
47. Otieno, R., & Jeffrey, M. (2007). A decade of Alternative Investment Market (AIM)–but little impact on the UK apparel sector. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management : An International Journal, 11(3), 441–444.
48. Palmrose, Z.-V. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size : Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 97–110.
49. Pong, C., Gonthier-Besacier, N., & Schatt, A. (2007). Determinants of audit fees for French quoted firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 139–160.
50. Pong, C. K. M. (2004). A descriptive analysis of audit price changes in the UK 1991–95. European Accounting Review, 13(1), 161–178.
51. Pong, C. M., & Whittington, G. (1994). The determinants of audit fees : Some empirical models. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 21(8), 1071–1095.
52. Rezaee, Z. (2009). Corporate governance and ethics. John Wiley & Sons.
53. Rick, H., Dassen, R., Schilder, A., & Wallage, P. (2005). Principles of Auditing : An Introduction to International Standards on Auditing. London : Prentice Hall.
54. Sandra, W. M. H., & Patrick, P. H. N. (1993). The determinants of Audit Fees in Hong Kong : An Empirical Study’. Asian Review of Accounting, 4 (2), 32-50.
55. Simon, D. T., & Francis, J. R. (1988). The effects of auditor change on audit fees : Tests of price cutting and price recovery. Accounting Review, 255–269.
56. Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services : Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 161–190.
57. Simunic, D. A. (1984). Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(2), 679–702.
58. Soltani, B. (2007). Auditing : An international approach. pearson education.
59. Stewart, J., & Munro, L. (2007). The impact of audit committee existence and audit committee meeting frequency on the external audit : Perceptions of Australian auditors. International Journal of Auditing, 11(1), 51–69.
60. Sweeney, J. T., & Summers, S. L. (2002). The effect of the busy season workload on public accountants’ job burnout. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14(1), 223–245.
61. Thinggaard, F., & Kiertzner, L. (2008). Determinants of audit fees : Evidence from a small capital market with a joint audit requirement. International Journal of Auditing, 12(2), 141–158.
62. Van Caneghem, T. (2010). Audit pricing and the Big4 fee premium : evidence from Belgium. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(2), 122–139.
63. Vu, D. H. T. (2012). Determinants of audit fees for Swedish listed non-financial firms in NASDAQ OMX Stockholm.
64. Whisenant, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non‐audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(4), 721–744.
65. Whittred, G., & Zimmer, I. (1984). Timeliness of financial reporting and financial distress. Accounting Review, 287–295.
66. Willmott, H. (1986). Organising the profession : a theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the UK. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(6), 555–580.
67. Xu, Y. (2011). The Determinants of Audit Fees : An Empirical Study of China´ s listed companies.
68. Yaacob, N. M., & Che-Ahmad, A. (2012). Audit fees after IFRS adoption : Evidence from Malaysia. Eurasian Business Review, 2(1), 31–46.
69. Zhang, M.-W., & Myrteza, S. (1996). The determinants of audit fees : Australian perspective. Asian Review of Accounting, 4(1), 81–97.
How to Cite
Authors retain copyright
The use of a Creative Commons License enables authors/editors to retain copyright to their work. Publications can be reused and redistributed as long as the original author is correctly attributed.
- The researcher(s), whether a single or joint research paper, must sell and transfer to the publisher (the Academic Journal of Nawroz University) through all the duration of the publication which starts from the date of entering this Agreement into force, the exclusive rights of the research paper/article. These rights include the translation, reuse of papers/articles, transmit or distribute, or use the material or parts(s) contained therein to be published in scientific, academic, technical, professional journals or any other periodicals including any other works derived from them, all over the world, in English and Arabic, whether in print or in electronic edition of such journals and periodicals in all types of media or formats now or that may exist in the future. Rights also include giving license (or granting permission) to a third party to use the materials and any other works derived from them and publish them in such journals and periodicals all over the world. Transfer right under this Agreement includes the right to modify such materials to be used with computer systems and software, or to reproduce or publish it in e-formats and also to incorporate them into retrieval systems.
- Reproduction, reference, transmission, distribution or any other use of the content, or any parts of the subjects included in that content in any manner permitted by this Agreement, must be accompanied by mentioning the source which is (the Academic Journal of Nawroz University) and the publisher in addition to the title of the article, the name of the author (or co-authors), journal’s name, volume or issue, publisher's copyright, and publication year.
- The Academic Journal of Nawroz University reserves all rights to publish research papers/articles issued under a “Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of the paper/article by any means, provided that the original work is correctly cited.
- Reservation of Rights
The researcher(s) preserves all intellectual property rights (except for the one transferred to the publisher under this Agreement).
- Researcher’s guarantee
The researcher(s) hereby guarantees that the content of the paper/article is original. It has been submitted only to the Academic Journal of Nawroz University and has not been previously published by any other party.
In the event that the paper/article is written jointly with other researchers, the researcher guarantees that he/she has informed the other co-authors about the terms of this agreement, as well as obtaining their signature or written permission to sign on their behalf.
The author further guarantees:
- The research paper/article does not contain any defamatory statements or illegal comments.
- The research paper/article does not violate other's rights (including but not limited to copyright, patent, and trademark rights).
This research paper/article does not contain any facts or instructions that could cause damages or harm to others, and publishing it does not lead to disclosure of any confidential information.