Opnet Based Performance Analysis and Comparison Among Different Physical Network Topologies


  • Noor N. Qaqos Shekhan Technical Institute, Duhok Polytechnic University, Kurdistan Region - Iraq
  • Subhi R. M. Zeebaree College of Engineering, Nawroz University, Duhok, Kurdisatn Region - Iraq
  • Bzar Kh. Hussan Engineering Technical College, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, Kurdisatn Region - Iraq




OPNET Simulator, Physical Network Topology, Delay, Load, Traffic Received, Number of Collision


Physical network topology is the configuration of computers, cables and other peripherals as a geometrical shape. There are many types of topologies each of them has many advantages and disadvantages. For high performance Local Area Networks (LANs), the builder of a network should select the best physical network topology.  This paper analyzes three basic network topologies including bus, star and ring for different number of connected nodes (various network topology size) using OPNET simulator. Four scenarios are configured for each topology with number of connected nodes equal to 5, 10, 15 and 20 for senario1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. In this analysis, four parameters investigated in Delay (Sec.) for the complete network, Load (Bits/Sec.), Traffic Received (Bits/Sec.) and the number of Collision for single node (server). Performance comparison is made in each topology separately based on various network size and another comparison is also made between these topologies for the same number of connected devices. The comparison results indicate that performance decreased when the network size increased and also show that bus topology is more effected than two other topologies.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Harmeet S., Sukhjeet S. and Rahul M., Modeling, Evaluation and Analysis of Ring Topology for Computer Applications Using Simulation, International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing (IJCSMC), ISSN 2320–088X, 2 (1) ( 2013), 1-10.
2. Bobbinpreet K., OPNET based Analysis of Star Topology in Small Internetworks, International Journal of Electronics and Data Communication, 1 (1) (2012), 15-17.
3. Santanu S. and Pinaki P. A., A Study And Analysis on Computer Network Topology For Data Communication, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, ISSN 2250-2459, 3 (1) (2013), 522-525.
4. Mridula A., Rupesh D., Nitin J. and Deepak A., Comparative Analysis of Different Topologies based on Network-on-Chip Architectures, International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, ISSN 0974-2166, 6 (1) (2013), 29-40.
5. Sushruta M., Lamboder J. and Aarti P., Networking Devices and Topologies : A Succinct Study, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, ISSN : 2277-128X, 2 (11) (2012), 347-357.
6. Huang M. and Bode, B., A Performance Comparison of Tree and Ring Topologies in Distributed Systems, Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Proceedings of 19th IEEE International Conference, ( 2005).
7. Pankaj R. and Dilpreet K., Optimizing Performance of Token Ring for Balanced and Unbalanced Load Using OPNET, International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, ISSN 2229-5518, 2 (6) 2011, 1-4.
8. IT Guru Academic Edition, OPNET Technologies, 2007. Retrieved on April 5, 2007 from http ://www.opnet.com/services/university/itguru_academic_edition.html



How to Cite

Qaqos, N. N., Zeebaree, S. R. M., & Hussan, B. K. (2018). Opnet Based Performance Analysis and Comparison Among Different Physical Network Topologies. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 7(3), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v7n3a199