Solving the discrepancy between exploitation and exploration (Theoretical treatment)
The current study sought to try to investigate the difference between the concept of exploration and exploitation and the reason for the contradiction between them, in addition to trying to find a solution to this contradiction by proposing intellectual concepts and theoretical treatment by explaining the two concepts and how to harmonize between them, or even linking them through organizational prowess, which is considered an attempt to solve This contradiction, in order to come up with intellectual premises and ways to address the problems of the organizations by showing a specific mechanism presented by the study of how to benefit from the two concepts, and not one at the expense of the other.
A number of conclusions were reached, the most important of which is that the balance between exploitation and exploration is a very difficult challenge in organizations that suffer from a lack of resources, capabilities and expertise.
The study also reached a set of recommendations represented not to take too long in resolving the contradiction with the government and how to choose one of them, but to find a way to solve the contradiction and use the best or both.
1. شرفاني، دلمان خوشفي رمضان، (2015)، تأثير البراعة التنظيمية في تحسين أبعاد جودة الخدمة الفندقية، دراسة استطلاعية لآراء المديرين لعينة من الفنادق الأربعة والخمسة نجوم في محافظتي دهوك وأربيل، رسالة ماجستير غير منشورة، كلية الإدارة والاقتصاد، جامعة دهوك، العراق.
1. Bodwell, Wendy, (2011), A Theoretical model of organizational ambidexterity in hospitals, dissertation, school of education, in partial fulfillment of the requirements, for the degree of doctor of philosophy, Colorado State University, fort collins, Colorado
2. Bruijn, Edwin De (E.A.G), how to achieve Contextual Ambidexterity, (2011), Strategic Management, Department of Organization and Strategy,Master thesis, Tilburg University,Holland.
3. Jansen, Justin, (2005), Ambidextrous Organizations, a multiple-level study of absorptive capacity, exploratory and exploitative innovation and, performance, phd thesis, erasmus research institute of management (Erim), Erasmus University Rotterdam., Holland.
4. Yigit, Mert, (2013), Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration in Organization, ,Master thesis, Entrepreneurship and Business Development, School of Management, Blekinge Institute of Technology, sweden.
5. Andriopoulos, Constantine., and Lewis, Marianne W., (2009). Exploitation-exporation tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4.
6. Benner, M. J., Tushman, M. L. (2003), Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 2, No. 28.
7. Bodwell, Wendy, (2011), A Theoretical model of organizational ambidexterity in hospitals, dissertation, school of education, in partial fulfillment of the requirements, for the degree of doctor of philosophy, Colorado State University, fort collins, Colorado.
8. Bot, S.D. (2012), Process Ambidexterity for Entrepreneurial Firms, journal of Technology Innovation Management Review
9. Bunge, M, (2004), How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2.
10. Datta, Avimanyu, (2011), Review and Extension on Ambidexterity: A Theoretical Model Integrating Networks and Absorptive Capacity, Journal of Management and Strategy, Vol. 2, No. 1.
11. Floyd, S., and Lane, P. (2000), Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25.
12. Gibson, C.B., and Birkinshaw, J. (2004), The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management, Journal, Vol. 47, No.2.
13. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G. and Shalley, C. E. (2006), The Interplay between Exploration and Exploitation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 4.
14. He, Z.-L., and Wong, P.-K. (2004), Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis, Journal of Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 4.
15. Holmqvist, M., (2004), Experiential learning processes of exploration and exploitation within and between organizations, An empirical study of product development, Journal of Organization science, Vol. 15.
16. Karrer, Daniel and Fleck, Denise Lima, (2013), Theoretical Explorations into Organizational Ambidexterity: Enabling the Construct´s Exploitation in Practice, Enanpad, XXXVii Encontro do ANPAD, Rio do Joneiro/ RJ- 7 a 11 de setembro de Organization Science, Vol. 18, No. 4.
17. Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., and Veiga, J. F. (2006), Ambidexterity and performance in small - to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of TMT behavioral integration, Journal of Management, Vol. 32, No. 5.
18. Luscher L. and Lewis, M. (2008), Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 51.
19. O’Reilly C.A. and Tushman (2011), Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit, California Management Review, Vol. 53, No. 4.
20. O’Reilly, C. A., and Tushman, M. L. (2013c), Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future Academy of Management Perspectives (in press), Stanford Research Paper Series No. 2130.
21. Okhuisen, G.A. and K.M. Eisenhardt (2002), Integrating knowledge in groups: how formal, interventions enable flexibility, Journal of Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 4.
22. O'Reilly, C. A. and Tushman, M. L. (2004), The Ambidextrous Organization, Harvard business review, Vol. 82, No. 4.
23. Puranam, Pranish, Harbir Singh, and Maurizio Zollo, (2006), Organizing for Innovation: Managing the Coordination- Autonomy Dilemma in Technology Acquisitions, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49.
24. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J. (2008), Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecendents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, Vol. 34, No. 3.
25. Sheremata, W. A. (2000), Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 2, PP: 389-408
26. Simsek, Z. (2009), Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, No. 4.
27. Smith, W. K., and Lewis, M. W. (2011), Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 2.
28. Smith, W.K. and Tushman, Michael L., (2005), Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams, Journal of Organization Science, Vol. 165.
29. Surendra, Bhusal, Dimitar, Korkov and Kaveh, Zadeh Sedigh, (2012), Ambidexterity and Success In the Swedish Construction Industry, Jönköping International Business School, Journal of Jönköping University, Sweden.
30. Szulanski, Martin & Wiener, Martin, (2013), Challenges and Dilemmas in Open Innovation: Ambidexterity as Management Approach, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Information Systems III, Nuremberg, Germany, 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, 27th February – 01st March Leipzig, Germany.
How to Cite
Authors retain copyright
The use of a Creative Commons License enables authors/editors to retain copyright to their work. Publications can be reused and redistributed as long as the original author is correctly attributed.
- The researcher(s), whether a single or joint research paper, must sell and transfer to the publisher (the Academic Journal of Nawroz University) through all the duration of the publication which starts from the date of entering this Agreement into force, the exclusive rights of the research paper/article. These rights include the translation, reuse of papers/articles, transmit or distribute, or use the material or parts(s) contained therein to be published in scientific, academic, technical, professional journals or any other periodicals including any other works derived from them, all over the world, in English and Arabic, whether in print or in electronic edition of such journals and periodicals in all types of media or formats now or that may exist in the future. Rights also include giving license (or granting permission) to a third party to use the materials and any other works derived from them and publish them in such journals and periodicals all over the world. Transfer right under this Agreement includes the right to modify such materials to be used with computer systems and software, or to reproduce or publish it in e-formats and also to incorporate them into retrieval systems.
- Reproduction, reference, transmission, distribution or any other use of the content, or any parts of the subjects included in that content in any manner permitted by this Agreement, must be accompanied by mentioning the source which is (the Academic Journal of Nawroz University) and the publisher in addition to the title of the article, the name of the author (or co-authors), journal’s name, volume or issue, publisher's copyright, and publication year.
- The Academic Journal of Nawroz University reserves all rights to publish research papers/articles issued under a “Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of the paper/article by any means, provided that the original work is correctly cited.
- Reservation of Rights
The researcher(s) preserves all intellectual property rights (except for the one transferred to the publisher under this Agreement).
- Researcher’s guarantee
The researcher(s) hereby guarantees that the content of the paper/article is original. It has been submitted only to the Academic Journal of Nawroz University and has not been previously published by any other party.
In the event that the paper/article is written jointly with other researchers, the researcher guarantees that he/she has informed the other co-authors about the terms of this agreement, as well as obtaining their signature or written permission to sign on their behalf.
The author further guarantees:
- The research paper/article does not contain any defamatory statements or illegal comments.
- The research paper/article does not violate other's rights (including but not limited to copyright, patent, and trademark rights).
This research paper/article does not contain any facts or instructions that could cause damages or harm to others, and publishing it does not lead to disclosure of any confidential information.