PSYCHOLINGUISTIC PECULIARITIES OF VERBAL AGGRESSION IN ENGLISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE

Authors

  • Yulia bakai Department of English Language, College of Education and Languages, Lebanese French University, Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v11n2a1258

Keywords:

speech aspects, verbal aggression, insults; social pressure, forms of speech act, communicative features, emotional relaxation of the subject, structure of linguistic violence, pragmatic diagnostics, national linguistic forms

Abstract

Psycholinguistic peculiarities of verbal aggression in English political discourse. The article examines aspects of speech aggression that allows social pressure to be exercised in the conditions of the asymmetric social status of participants in verbal communications. The factors of linguistic objectification are investigated from the perspective of age, social, gender, personal characteristics and characteristics of subjects of discourse. As an example of verbal aggression, the speech acts of public speeches of the incumbent President of the United States of America D. Trump, which are considered as an integral part of an individual's activities, due to high semantic significance and the necessary level of interpersonal interaction, were subjected to linguistic analysis. The use of aggression in Trump's political discourse is is guided by reason, not emotion. His consistent use of derogatory nicknames, constant attention to the media, as well as the selection of offensive words that draw attention to the specific shortcomings of his addressees indicate that aggression is not based on impulsiveness or randomness. Verbal aggression aimed at lowering the opponent's social status is one of the methods of an offensive strategy and affects, sometimes significantly, the decision-making of an offended person. The use of methods of verbal aggression by D. Trump in the context of political discourse can be a powerful "weapon" both in relation to the internal political situation and in the external political arena. Such aspects, in the context of the increasing influence of forms of digital culture on the psycho-emotional sphere of a person, leave researchers with ample opportunities in the field of scientific research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, J. J., Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2018). "The General Aggression Model. " Current Opinion in Psychology, 19: 75-80.

Anderson, C. A., & Carnagey, N. L. (2004). Violent evil and the General Aggression Model. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (p. 168–192). The Guilford Press.

Anderson, C. A., Deuser, W. E., & DeNeve, K. M. (1995). Hot temperatures, hostile affect, hostile cognition, and arousal: Tests of a general model of affective aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 434-448.

Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). “Human aggression”. Journal of Annual Review of Psychology, 53: 27-51.

Bower, G. H. (1981). " Mood and memory." American Psychologist, 36(2): 129–148.

Donald Trump campaign speech in Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://www.pohtico.com/story/2016/08/full-text-donald-trumps-speech-on-227095

Donald Trump's Speech West Bend, Wisconsin. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qYf7uRGruY&index=2&list=PLs6KnRgy eUx7hZw7VH3-to0r2cy_oSh9B&t=1701 s

Gilbert, F., & Daffern, M. (2011). "Illuminating the relationship between personality disorder and violence: Contributions of the General Aggression Model." Psychology of Violence, 1(3): 230–244.

Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In Higgins, E. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), In Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). "A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure." Psychological Review, 102(2):246–268.

President Trump's historic speech to 2018 March for Life. Retrieved from https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/full-text-president-trumps-historic-speech-to-march-for-life.

TeleTrader Public WebStation Retrieved from https://www.teletrader.com/trump-blasts-us-media-coverage-of-iran/news/d etails/47997133?ts= 1587673421476 (data obrashcheniya: 19.03.2020).

The 598 People, Places and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/in teractive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitterinsults.html?hpw&rref=upshot&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-regi on&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well

Published

2022-04-23

How to Cite

bakai, Y. (2022). PSYCHOLINGUISTIC PECULIARITIES OF VERBAL AGGRESSION IN ENGLISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 11(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v11n2a1258

Issue

Section

Articles