Evaluating the Use of Kurdish in Efl Classes at Secondary Schools in Duhok City: A Teacher’s Perspective

Authors

  • Asma A. Hussein English Department, College of Languages, University of Duhok, Duhok- Kurdistan Region of Iraq
  • Hamza Zeebaree English Department, College of Languages, University of Duhok, Duhok- Kurdistan Region of Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v9n2a822

Abstract

This study examines the use of first language (L1) in secondary school EFL classes in Duhok city in the Kurdistan Region - Iraq. The use of L1 in EFL classes has been an ongoing debate among researchers and practitioners across the globe especially as regards its role as a facilitator of, or a hinderance/barrier to the teaching of English. Hence, the researcher aims to discover whether or not the use of Kurdish facilitates the teaching of English, in secondary schools in Duhok city. In addition, the researcher aims at finding out on what basis do teachers decide to use L1 and for what purposes do they use it. In this study, among the participants were 50 English language teachers from different secondary schools in Duhok city. The data were collected through interviews. The results indicated that the use of L1 (Kurdish) facilitates teaching of foreign language (FL) and that a balanced and judicious use of L1 in the EFL classroom by teachers can be useful in the language learning process especially with regard to grammar and vocabulary instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Alshammari, M. M. (2011). The use of the mother tongue in Saudi EFL classrooms. Journal of International Education Research, 4(1), 64-95.
2. Atkinson, D. (1993). Teaching monolingual classes. London: Longman.
3. AL-Nofaie, H. (2010). The attitudes of teachers and students towards using Arabic in EFL classrooms in Saudi public schools – a case study. Novitas-Royal, 4(1), 64-95.
4. Carless, D. (2001). Implementing task-based learning with young learners. In ELT Journal, 46 (4).
5. Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402-423.
6. Harbord, J. (1992). The use of mother tongue in the classroom. ELT Journal, 46 (4).
7. Hawks, P. (2001). Making distinction: A discussion of the mother tongue in the foreign language classroom. Hwa Kang Journal of TEFL, 7, (47-55).
8. James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. London: Longman.
9. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input hypothesis and implication. London: Longman.
10. Kurdistan (2013). A Summary on Kurdistan Regional Government, Retrieved from http://www.sunrisekurdistan.com
11. Macaro, E. (1997). Target language, collaborative learning and autonomy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
12. Nazary, M. (2008). The role of L1 in L2 acquisition: Attitudes of Iranian university students. Novitas Royal, 2(2), 138-153.
13. Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language teaching. London: Cambridge University Press.
14. Oflaz, Ö. (2009). Teachers and students’ views on using mother tongue in ELT classrooms (A case study at Gaziantep University.)
15. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
16. Pokharel, B. R. (2001). Applied Linguistics. Kathmandu: Jupiter Publishers and Distributors.
17. Schweers, W. Jr. (1999). Using L1 in the L2 classroom. English Teaching Forum, 37 (2), 6-9.
18. Tang, J. (2002). Using L1 in the English classroom. English Teaching Forum, 40 (1), 36-43.

Published

2020-08-20

How to Cite

Hussein, A. A., & Zeebaree, H. (2020). Evaluating the Use of Kurdish in Efl Classes at Secondary Schools in Duhok City: A Teacher’s Perspective. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 9(2), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v9n2a822

Issue

Section

Articles