And the balanced scorecard (Conceptual approach)

Authors

  • Mahfoudh H. Al-Sawaf Department of Economics, Nawroz University, Kurdistan region of Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v9n1a711

Abstract

The rapid changes in the business environment led many organizations to think about enhancing their competitiveness, which prompted them to adopt new management approaches, the most prominent of which is the comprehensive quality management approach that emphasizes quality in all the operations of the organization and not only in the quality of the production or service process, starting from the core Total Quality Management philosophy that emphasizes that quality is everyone's responsibility. The proper application of the TQM approach requires changing the traditional systems that did not give sufficient attention to continuous improvement as one of the important areas of success factors, and this prompted the researchers Kaplin & Norton to provide a model for measuring performance called the balanced performance card.
In this research paper, emphasis will be placed on the balanced scorecard through its four perspectives to measure organizational performance, namely customer, financial, internal operations, continuing education and growth, as well as the philosophical basis on which it is based. As for total quality management, it was discussed through the philosophy underlying the fundamental principles associated with it, namely customer satisfaction, continuous improvement and participation of all and how to apply them. As for the last section of the paper, it will focus on finding a space for the approach between total quality management and balanced performance card.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

- Mika Hannula,Harril.K umala,petri.Suomala.(2000)Total Quality Management and Balanced 'Scorecard: A comparative Analysis, Tampere, Finland .
2- Goestsch& Davic,(2006),Introduction to Total Quality ,(Quality of production ,processing and services ) 2nd edition, Pearson Education, Inc. New Gersy pp 1-813.
3-Deming,W.E(1982) Out of Crisis_ Quality ,productivity and competitive .position ,Cambridge University press P(507)
4 -الصواف،محفوظ حمدون, صالح, ماجد محمد (2007), ادارة الجودة الشاملة كاداة لتقليل مخاطر الهدر, دراسة ميدانية في معمل الغزل والنسيج الحكومي بالموصل, مجلة بحوث مستقبلية, العدد (20), ص 41-78)).
5-الصواف, محفوظ حمدون, (2019), الابعاد الفلسفية والاستراتيجية والقياسية لادارة الجودة الشاملة, مقاربة دراسية, المجلة الاكادمية لجامعة نوروز المجلد (8), العدد (59).
6- Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David P., (1992). "The Balanced Scorecard Measures that drive performance". Harvard Business Review,Vol.70, 71-79.
7-Gregory,Chow,Geolprey.Moore,An-lonlin(1972) An Econometric Model of Business Cycles, .Princeton University , Bureau of labour statistics.
8-Olve,N,Roy.J.Wetter.M,(2000) performance drivers A practical Guide to using the Balanced scorecard , Jon wily &sons , chichester, New York.
9- Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David P., (1993) "Putting
The Balanced Scorecard to Work". Harvard Business Review

10- Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David P., (1996a). "The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action". Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11- Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David P., (1992). "The Balanced Scorecard Measures that drive performance". Harvard Business Review,Vol.70, 71-79 .
المغربي ,عبدالحميد عبد الفتاح (2000) ,الادارة الستراتيجية لقياس الاداء المتوازن , -12 المكتبة العصرية,المنصورة ,ص 243
13-Hoque Z.,(2003) "Total quality management and the balanced scorecard approach: A critical analysis of their potential relationships and directions for research", Critical perspectives on Accounting ; 14 (5).

Published

2020-03-27

How to Cite

Al-Sawaf, M. H. (2020). And the balanced scorecard (Conceptual approach). Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 9(1), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v9n1a711

Issue

Section

Articles